% This file was created with JabRef 2.9.2. % Encoding: UTF8 @CONFERENCE{Durco2011, author = {Matej \v{D}ur\v{c}o and Leif-J\"{o}ran Olsson}, title = {{CMDRSB} - {CLARIN Metadata Repository/Service/Browser}}, booktitle = {Presentation at CMDI Workshop, Nijmegen}, year = {2011}, address = {Nijmegen}, month = {01}, organization = {MPI for Psycholinguistics}, file = {:C\:\\Users\\m\\3lingua\\clarin\\CMDI\\MDService\\CMDRSB_20110123.pdf:PDF}, owner = {m}, timestamp = {2011.10.12} } % month = {07}, % note = {Status: personal view only. Editing status: imperfect but published. % Last visited: 2011-04-13}, @ELECTRONIC{TimBL2006, author = {Tim Berners-Lee}, year = {2006}, title = {Linked Data}, language = {en}, howpublished = {online: http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html}, url = {http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html}, file = {:semweb\\TimBL2006_LinkedData.html:URL}, owner = {m}, timestamp = {2011.03.26} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Broeder+2010, author = {Daan Broeder and Marc Kemps-Snijders and others}, title = {A Data Category Registry- and Component-based Metadata Framework}, booktitle = {LREC}, year = {2010}, editor = {Nicoletta Calzolari and Khalid Choukri and others}, address = {Valletta}, month = {May}, publisher = {ELRA}, abstract = {We describe our computer-supported framework to overcome the rule of metadataschism. It combines the use of controlled vocabularies,managed by a data category registry, with a component-based approach, where thecategories can be combined to yield complex metadatastructures. A metadata scheme devised in this way will thus be grounded in itsuse of categories. Schema designers will profit fromexisting prefabricated larger building blocks, motivating re-use at a largerscale. The common base of any two metadata schemes withinthis framework will solve, at least to a good extent, the semanticinteroperability problem, and consequently, further promote systematicuse of metadata for existing resources and tools to be shared.}, date = {19-21}, file = {Broeder2010_LREC_163_Paper.pdf:lingua\\Broeder2010_LREC_163_Paper.pdf:PDF}, isbn = {2-9517408-6-7}, keywords = {CLARIN, LR Infrastructures and Architectures, Metadata, Tools systems applications, DCR, CompReg}, language = {english}, owner = {m}, personalnote = {BROEDER10.163}, timestamp = {2011.03.31}, url = {www.clarin.eu/system/files/cmdi_isocat_Paper.pdf; http://www.windhouwer.nl/menzo/professional/papers/metaData.pdf} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Broeder+2011, author = {Broeder, Daan and Schonefeld, Oliver and Trippel, Thorsten and Van Uytvanck, Dieter and Witt, Andreas}, title = {{A pragmatic approach to XML interoperability - the Component Metadata Infrastructure (CMDI)}}, booktitle = {Balisage: The Markup Conference 2011}, year = {2011}, volume = {7}, note = {citeulike:9861691}, citeulike-article-id = {9861691}, journal = {Balisage Series on Markup Technologies}, owner = {m}, posted-at = {2011-10-07 11:11:32}, priority = {2}, timestamp = {2011.10.12} } % month = {09}, @MISC{Cyganiak2010, author = {Richard Cyganiak and Anja Jentzsch}, title = {The Linking Open Data cloud diagram}, howpublished = {online: http://lod-cloud.net/}, year = {2010}, abstract = {his web page is the home of the LOD cloud diagram. This image shows datasets that have been published in Linked Data format, by contributors to the Linking Open Data community project and other individuals and organisations. It is based on metadata collected and curated by contributors to the CKAN directory. Clicking the image will take you to an image map, where each dataset is a hyperlink to its homepage.}, affiliation = {{DERI, NUI Galway}, {Freie Universit�t Berlin}}, file = {Cyganiak2010_lod-datasets_2010-09-22_colored.png:semweb\\Cyganiak2010_lod-datasets_2010-09-22_colored.png:PNG image}, keywords = {Linked Data}, owner = {m}, timestamp = {2011.03.25}, url = {http://richard.cyganiak.de/2007/10/lod/} } @INCOLLECTION{EhrigSure2004, author = {Ehrig, Marc and Sure, York}, title = {Ontology Mapping -- An Integrated Approach}, booktitle = {The Semantic Web: Research and Applications}, publisher = {Springer Berlin / Heidelberg}, year = {2004}, editor = {Bussler, Christoph and Davies, John and Fensel, Dieter and Studer, Rudi}, volume = {3053}, series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science}, pages = {76-91}, note = {10.1007/978-3-540-25956-5\_6}, abstract = {Ontology mapping is important when working with more than one ontology. Typically similarity considerations are the basis for this. In this paper an approach to integrate various similarity methods is presented. In brief, we determine similarity through rules which have been encoded by ontology experts. These rules are then combined for one overall result. Several boosting small actions are added. All this is thoroughly evaluated with very promising results.}, affiliation = {Institute AIFB, University of Karlsruhe}, cites = {Noy2003, Do2002}, citeseercitationcount = {68}, citeseerurl = {http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.10.4772}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25956-5\_6}, file = {EhrigSure2004_10.1.1.10.4772.pdf:semweb\\EhrigSure2004_10.1.1.10.4772.pdf:PDF}, googlecitationcount = {348}, owner = {m}, timestamp = {2011.04.13}, url = {http://www.springerlink.com/index/T3M6YJDEB99FT7AK.pdf; http://www.springerlink.com/content/t3m6yjdeb99ft7ak/} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Gavrilidou2012meta, author = {Gavrilidou, Maria and Labropoulou, Penny and others}, title = {The {META-SHARE} Metadata Schema for the Description of Language Resources}, booktitle = {LREC}, year = {2012}, editor = {Nicoletta Calzolari and Khalid Choukri and others}, address = {Istanbul}, month = {May}, publisher = {ELRA}, date = {23-25}, isbn = {978-2-9517408-7-7}, language = {english}, owner = {m}, timestamp = {2013.06.19} } @TECHREPORT{Haslhofer2011europeana, author = {Bernhard Haslhofer and Elaheh Momeni Roochi and Bernhard Schandl and Stefan Zander}, title = {Europeana RDF Store Report}, institution = {University of Vienna}, year = {2011}, type = {Technical Report}, address = {Vienna}, month = {March}, abstract = {Expressing data in RDF is one of the principles to be considered when making data available as Linked Data on the Web. This can be achieved using RDF-wrappers for existing (relational) data stores or by using RDF stores as data repositories. The latter requires special RDF storage solutions, many of which are available today. Organizations often have difficulties to decide which solution they should adopt because comprehensive comparisons of existing RDF stores are hardly available and experiences w.r.t performance and scalability are still missing. In this report, we summarize the results of qualitative and quantitative study we carried out on existing RDF stores in the context of the European Digital Library project. We give a detailed overview on existing RDF store solutions, analyze their functional and non-functional features, summarize the outcomes of other, previously carried out studies, and conduct a Linked-Data oriented performance evaluation on a subset of existing triple stores w.r.t to load and query time. The results of this study show that certain RDF stores, such as OpenLink Virtuoso or 4Store, can deal with the Europeana data volume and answer those SPARQL queries that are relevant for exposing Europeana metadata as Linked Data in an acceptable time-range.}, file = {Haslhofer2011europeana_ts_report.pdf:semweb\\Haslhofer2011europeana_ts_report.pdf:PDF}, owner = {m}, timestamp = {2013.10.03}, url = {http://eprints.cs.univie.ac.at/2833/} } @INPROCEEDINGS{hinrichs-hinrichs-zastrow:2010:Demos, author = {Hinrichs, Erhard and Hinrichs, Marie and Zastrow, Thomas}, title = {WebLicht: Web-Based LRT Services for German}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the ACL 2010 System Demonstrations}, year = {2010}, pages = {25--29}, address = {Uppsala, Sweden}, month = {July}, publisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics}, url = {http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P10-4005} } @STANDARD{ISODIS24622-1_2013, title = {Language resource management -- Component Metadata Infrastructure -- Part 1: The Component Metadata Model (CMDI-1)}, organization = {ISO}, author = {{ISO/DIS 24622-1}}, type = {International Standard}, number = {24622-1}, address = {Geneva, Switzerland}, year = {2013}, url = {http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=37336}, owner = {m}, publisher = {ISO}, timestamp = {2014.02.05} } @STANDARD{ISO12620:2009, title = {Specification of data categories and management of a Data Category Registry for language resources}, organization = {ISO}, author = {{ISO 12620}}, type = {International Standard}, number = {12620}, address = {Geneva, Switzerland}, year = {2009}, url = {http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=37243}, abstract = {ISO 12620:2009 provides guidelines concerning constraints related to the implementation of a Data Category Registry (DCR) applicable to all types of language resources, for example, terminological, lexicographical, corpus-based, machine translation, etc. It specifies mechanisms for creating, selecting and maintaining data categories, as well as an interchange format for representing them.}, owner = {m}, publisher = {ISO}, timestamp = {2011.04.12} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Joerg2010, author = {Brigitte J\"{o}rg and Hans Uszkoreit and Alastair Burt}, title = {{LT World}: Ontology and Reference Information Portal}, booktitle = {LREC}, year = {2010}, editor = {Nicoletta Calzolari and Khalid Choukri et al.}, address = {Valletta, Malta}, month = {May}, publisher = {ELRA}, abstract = {LT World (www.lt-world.org) is an ontology-driven web portal aimed at servingthe global language technology community. Ontology-driven means, that thesystem is driven by an ontological schema to manage the research informationand knowledge life-cycles: identify relevant concepts of information, structureand formalize them, assign relationships, functions and views, add states andrules, modify them. For modelling such a complex structure, we employ (i)concepts from the research domain, such as person, organisation, project, tool,data, patent, news, event (ii) concepts from the LT domain, such as technologyand resource (iii) concepts from closely related domains, such as language,linguistics, and mathematics. Whereas the research entities represent thegeneral context, that is, a research environment as such, the LT entitiesdefine the information and knowledge space of the field, enhanced by entitiesfrom closely related areas. By managing information holistically ― that is,within a research context ― its inherent semantics becomes much moretransparent. This paper introduces LT World as a reference information portalthrough ontological eyes: its content, its system, its method for maintainingknowledge-rich items, its ontology as an asset.}, affiliation = {DFKI}, date = {19-21}, file = {Joerg2010_LREC_714_Paper.pdf:ontolingua\\Joerg2010_LREC_714_Paper.pdf:PDF}, isbn = {2-9517408-6-7}, language = {english}, owner = {m}, personalnote = {orig-bibkey=JRG10.714}, timestamp = {2011.03.31} } @ARTICLE{Kalfoglou2003, author = {Kalfoglou, Yannis and Schorlemmer, Marco}, title = {{Ontology mapping: the state of the art}}, journal = {The Knowledge Engineering Review}, year = {2003}, volume = {18}, pages = {1--31}, number = {1}, month = jan, abstract = {Ontology mapping is seen as a solution provider in today's landscape of ontology research. As the number of ontologies that are made publicly available and accessible on the Web increases steadily, so does the need for applications to use them. A single ontology is no longer enough to support the tasks envisaged by a distributed environment like the Semantic Web. Multiple ontologies need to be accessed from several applications. Mapping could provide a common layer from which several ontologies could be accessed and hence could exchange information in semantically sound manners. Developing such mappings has been the focus of a variety of works originating from diverse communities over a number of years. In this article we comprehensively review and present these works. We also provide insights on the pragmatics of ontology mapping and elaborate on a theoretical approach for defining ontology mapping.}, citeseerurl = {http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.57.9148}, comment = {orig-bibtex: CambridgeJournals:183299}, doi = {10.1017/S0269888903000651, 10.1.1.85.1117}, file = {Kalfoglou2003_OntoMap_10.1.1.85.1117.pdf:semweb\\Kalfoglou2003_OntoMap_10.1.1.85.1117.pdf:PDF}, issn = {02698889}, keywords = {integration,ontologies,ontology,ontology alignment,ontology mapping,ontology merging}, owner = {m}, timestamp = {2011.03.25}, url = {http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract\_S0269888903000651} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Kemps-Snijders+2009, author = {Marc Kemps-Snijders and Menzo Windhouwer and Peter Wittenburg}, title = {{ISOcat}: Remodeling metadata for language resources}, booktitle = {International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies (IJMSO)}, year = {2009}, volume = {4 (4)}, pages = {261--276}, date-added = {2011-05-18 13:28:45 +0200}, date-modified = {2011-05-18 13:29:52 +0200}, owner = {m}, timestamp = {2011.10.12} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Kemps-Snijders+2008, author = {Marc Kemps-Snijders and Menzo Windhouwer and Sue Ellen Wright}, title = {Putting data categories in their semantic context}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE e-Humanities Workshop (e-Humanities)}, year = {2008}, address = {Indianapolis, Indiana, USA}, month = {December}, date-added = {2011-05-18 13:28:45 +0200}, date-modified = {2011-05-18 13:29:52 +0200}, file = {Kemps-Snijders2008_e-Humanities-ISOcat-final.pdf:lingua\\Kemps-Snijders2008_e-Humanities-ISOcat-final.pdf:PDF}, owner = {m}, timestamp = {2011.10.12}, url = {http://www.isocat.org/files/publications.html} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Piperidis2012meta, author = {Piperidis, Stelios}, title = {The meta-share language resources sharing infrastructure: Principles, challenges, solutions}, booktitle = {Proceedings of LREC 2012}, year = {2012}, pages = {36--42}, owner = {m}, timestamp = {2013.06.19} } @TECHREPORT{DCMI:2005, author = {Powell, A. and Nilsson, M. and Naeve, A. and Johnston, P.}, title = {{DCMI Abstract Model}}, year = {2005}, month = mar, abstract = {{This document specifies an abstract model for DCMI metadata [DCMI]. The primary purpose of this document is to provide a reference model against which particular DC encoding guidelines can be compared. To function well, a reference model needs to be independent of any particular encoding syntax. Such a reference model allows us to gain a better understanding of the kinds of descriptions that we are trying to encode and facilitates the development of better mappings and translations between different syntaxes. This document is primarily aimed at the developers of software applications that support Dublin Core metadata, people involved in developing new syntax encoding guidelines for Dublin Core metadata and those people developing metadata application profiles based on the Dublin Core.}}, citeulike-article-id = {796966}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dublincore.org/documents/abstract-model/}, day = {7}, keywords = {dublin\_core, dublincore\_application\_profile}, organization = {Dublin Core Metadata Initiative}, owner = {m}, posted-at = {2006-08-11 08:09:55}, priority = {4}, timestamp = {2011.10.12}, url = {http://dublincore.org/documents/abstract-model/} } @ARTICLE{Rahm2001_survey, author = {Erhard Rahm and Philip A. Bernstein}, title = {A Survey of Approaches to Automatic Schema Matching}, journal = {VLDB JOURNAL}, year = {2001}, volume = {10}, pages = {2001}, abstract = {Schema matching is a basic problem in many database application domains, such as data integration, E-business, data warehousing, and semantic query processing. In current implementations, schema matching is typically performed manually, which has significant limitations. On the other hand, previous research papers have proposed many techniques to achieve a partial automation of the match operation for specific application domains. We present a taxonomy that covers many of these existing approaches, and we describe the approaches in some detail. In particular, we distinguish between schema-level and instance-level, element-level and structure-level, and language-based and constraint-based matchers. Based on our classification we review some previous match implementations thereby indicating which part of the solution space they cover. We intend our taxonomy and review of past work to be useful when comparing different approaches to schema matching, when developing a new match algorithm, and when implementing a schema matching component.}, citeseercitationcount = {701}, citeseerurl = {http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.16.700}, file = {Rahm2001_survey_VLDBJ-Dec2001.pdf:semweb\\Rahm2001_survey_VLDBJ-Dec2001.pdf:PDF}, keywords = {overview, schema matching}, owner = {m}, timestamp = {2011.04.10}, url = {http://dbs.uni-leipzig.de/file/VLDBJ-Dec2001.pdf} } @INPROCEEDINGS{SchuurmanWindhouwer2011, author = {Ineke Schuurman and Menzo Windhouwer}, title = {Explicit Semantics for Enriched Documents. What Do {ISOcat}, {RELcat} and {SCHEMAcat} Have To Offer?}, booktitle = {2nd Supporting Digital Humanities conference (SDH 2011), 17-18 November 2011, Copenhagen, Denmark}, year = {2011}, address = {Copenhagen, Denmark}, owner = {m}, timestamp = {2011.10.12} } @INCOLLECTION{Shvaiko2008, author = {Shvaiko, Pavel and Euzenat, J\'{e}r\^{o}me}, title = {Ten Challenges for Ontology Matching}, booktitle = {On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2008}, publisher = {Springer Berlin / Heidelberg}, year = {2008}, editor = {Meersman, Robert and Tari, Zahir}, volume = {5332}, series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science}, pages = {1164-1182}, note = {10.1007/978-3-540-88873-4\_18}, abstract = {This paper aims at analyzing the key trends and challenges of the ontology matching field. The main motivation behind this work is the fact that despite many component matching solutions that have been developed so far, there is no integrated solution that is a clear success, which is robust enough to be the basis for future development, and which is usable by non expert users. In this paper we first provide the basics of ontology matching with the help of examples. Then, we present general trends of the field and discuss ten challenges for ontology matching, thereby aiming to direct research into the critical path and to facilitate progress of the field.}, affiliation = {TasLab, Informatica Trentina S.p.A. Trento Italy}, file = {Shvaiko2008.pdf:semweb\\Shvaiko2008.pdf:PDF}, keywords = {ontology matching}, owner = {m}, timestamp = {2011.04.10}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88873-4\_18} } @TECHREPORT{Shvaiko2005, author = {Pavel Shvaiko and Jerome Euzenat}, title = {A classification of schema-based matching approaches}, year = {2005}, abstract = {Schema/ontology matching is a critical problem in many application domains, such as, semantic web, schema/ontology integration, data warehouses, e-commerce, catalog matching, etc. Many diverse solutions to the matching problem have been proposed so far. In this paper we present a taxonomy of schema-based matching techniques that builds on the previous work on classifying schema matching approaches. Some innovations are in introducing new criteria which distinguish between matching techniques relying on diverse semantic clues. In particular, we distinguish between heuristic and formal techniques at schemalevel; and implicit and explicit techniques at element- and structure-level. Based on the classification proposed we overview some of the recent schema/ontology matching systems pointing which part of the solution space they cover.}, cites = {Kalfoglou2003, Euzenat2007}, citeseercitationcount = {135}, citeseerurl = {http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.102.3578}, file = {Shvaiko2005_classification_087.pdf:semweb\\Shvaiko2005_classification_087.pdf:PDF}, journal = {JOURNAL ON DATA SEMANTICS}, keywords = {Schema-based Ontology-mapping, classification}, owner = {m}, pages = {146--171}, timestamp = {2011.04.10}, volume = {4} } @INPROCEEDINGS{VanUytvanck2010, author = {Dieter Van Uytvanck and Claus Zinn and others}, title = {Virtual Language Observatory: The Portal to the Language Resources and Technology Universe}, booktitle = {LREC}, year = {2010}, editor = {Nicoletta Calzolari and Khalid Choukri and others}, address = {Valletta}, month = {May}, publisher = {ELRA}, abstract = {Over the years, the field of Language Resources and Technology (LRT) hasdeveloped a tremendous amount of resources and tools. However, there is noready-to-use map that researchers could use to gain a good overview andsteadfast orientation when searching for, say corpora or software tools tosupport their studies. It is rather the case that information is scatteredacross project- or organisation-specific sites, which makes it hard if notimpossible for less-experienced researchers to gather all relevant material.Clearly, the provision of metadata is central to resource and softwareexploration. However, in the LRT field, metadata comes in many forms, tastesand qualities, and therefore substantial harmonization and curation efforts arerequired to provide researchers with metadata-based guidance. To address thisissue a broad alliance of LRT providers (CLARIN, the Linguist List, DOBES,DELAMAN, DFKI, ELRA) have initiated the Virtual Language Observatory portal toprovide a low-barrier, easy-to-follow entry point to language resources andtools; it can be accessed via http://www.clarin.eu/vlo}, date = {19-21}, file = {VanUytvanck2010_LREC_273_Paper.pdf:lingua\\VanUytvanck2010_LREC_273_Paper.pdf:PDF}, isbn = {2-9517408-6-7}, keywords = {CLARIN, VLO, LR Infrastructures and Architectures, Metadata, Tools systems applications}, language = {english}, owner = {m}, personalnote = {orig_key: VANUYTVANCK10.273}, timestamp = {2011.03.31} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Varadi2008, author = {Tam\'{a}s V\'{a}radi and Steven Krauwer and others}, title = {CLARIN: Common Language Resources and Technology Infrastructure}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC)}, year = {2008}, editor = {Nicoletta Calzolari and Khalid Choukri and others}, address = {Marrakech}, month = {May}, publisher = {ELRA}, abstract = {The paper provides a general introduction to the CLARIN project, a large-scale European research infrastructure project designed to establish an integrated and interoperable infrastructure of language resources and technologies. The goal is to make language resources and technology much more accessible to all researchers working with language material, particularly non-expert users in the Humanities and Social Sciences. CLARIN intends to build a virtual, distributed infrastructure consisting of a federation of trusted digital archives and repositories where language resources and tools are accessible through web services. The CLARIN project consists of 32 partners from 22 countries and is currently engaged in the preparatory phase of developing the infrastructure. The paper describes the objectives of the project in terms of its technical, legal, linguistic and user dimensions.}, affiliation = {Hungarian Academy of Sciences (Budapest), MPI for Psycholinguistics (Nijmegen), Utrecht University (Utrecht), Oxford Text Archive (Oxford), University of Helsinki (Helsinki)}, date = {28-30}, file = {Varadi2008_CLARIN_LREC_317_paper.pdf:lingua\\Varadi2008_CLARIN_LREC_317_paper.pdf:PDF;Varadi2008_CLARIN_LREC_pras_317.ppt:lingua\\Varadi2008_CLARIN_LREC_pras_317.ppt:PowerPoint}, googlecitationcount = {10}, isbn = {2-9517408-4-0}, keywords = {CLARIN, LR Infrastructures and Architectures}, language = {english}, owner = {m}, timestamp = {2011.04.01}, url = {http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2008/summaries/317.html} } @STANDARD{RDF2004, title = {Resource Description Framework (RDF)}, organization = {W3C}, author = {W3C}, year = {2004}, url = {http://www.w3.org/RDF/}, owner = {m}, timestamp = {2013.09.11} } @INPROCEEDINGS{WINDHOUWER12.954, author = {Menzo Windhouwer}, title = {{RELcat}: a Relation Registry for {ISOcat} data categories}, booktitle = {LREC}, year = {2012}, editor = {Nicoletta Calzolari and Khalid Choukri and others}, address = {Istanbul}, month = {May}, publisher = {ELRA}, date = {23-25}, isbn = {978-2-9517408-7-7}, language = {english} } @CONFERENCE{Windhouwer2011, author = {Menzo Windhouwer}, title = {RELcat and friends}, booktitle = {Presentation at {CLARIN-NL} {ISOcat} workshop}, year = {2011}, address = {Nijmegen}, month = {05}, organization = {MPI for Psycholinguistics}, file = {:C\:\\Users\\m\\3lingua\\clarin\\CMDI\\DCR-RR\\ISOcat-RELcat-and-friends.pptx:PowerPoint}, owner = {m}, timestamp = {2011.10.12} } @MISC{Windhouwer2011ISOcat_intro, author = {Menzo Windhouwer}, title = {{ISOcat} introduction at {CLARIN-NL} {ISOcat} workshop}, howpublished = {workshop presentation}, month = {05}, year = {2011}, owner = {m}, timestamp = {2013.09.30} } @INPROCEEDINGS{Windhouwer+2012, author = {Windhouwer, Menzo and Wright, Sue Ellen}, title = {Linking to linguistic data categories in {ISOcat}}, booktitle = {Linked Data in Linguistics}, year = {2012}, pages = {99--107}, address = {Frankfurt, Germany}, month = {March}, publisher = {Springer} } @INCOLLECTION{Windhouwer2012_LDL, author = {Windhouwer, Menzo and Wright, Sue Ellen}, title = {Linking to linguistic data categories in {ISOcat}}, booktitle = {Linked Data in Linguistics}, publisher = {Springer}, year = {2012}, pages = {99--107}, file = {Windhouwer2012_LDL.pdf:semweb\\Windhouwer2012_LDL.pdf:PDF}, owner = {m}, timestamp = {2013.04.27} } @incollection{Zinn+2012, year={2012}, isbn={978-3-642-30283-1}, booktitle={The Semantic Web: Research and Applications}, volume={7295}, series={Lecture Notes in Computer Science}, editor={Simperl, Elena and Cimiano, Philipp and Polleres, Axel and Corcho, Oscar and Presutti, Valentina}, doi={10.1007/978-3-642-30284-8_26}, title={The ISOcat Registry Reloaded}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30284-8_26}, publisher={Springer Berlin Heidelberg}, author={Zinn, Claus and Hoppermann, Christina and Trippel, Thorsten}, pages={285-299} } @comment{jabref-meta: selector_publisher:} @comment{jabref-meta: selector_author:} @comment{jabref-meta: selector_journal:} @comment{jabref-meta: selector_keywords:}